Here you will find links to other OVC resources available on the Internet This link provides you with a printer friendly version of the OVC Toolkit in Adobe Acrobat format! Please give us your comments and suggestions for the OVC Toolkit! If your Internet connection is slow you can copy the Toolkit to your computer and browse it from there!
DO I NEED THIS TOOLKIT?
WHAT DO I NEED TO KNOW?
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO?
ØDeveloping OVC Policies

ØBackground data
ØConsulting with stakeholders
ØDeciding what to do
ØCommon pitfalls
ØTargeting
ØMonitoring and evaluation
ØRoles and responsibilities
ØCosting issues

WHAT'S SPECIAL ABOUT MY SECTOR?

 


  Roles and Responsibilities during Implementation

 

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the different types of Implementing Partners?

Type of Implementing Agency

Strengths

Weaknesses

International NGOs, such as Save the Children, Christian Children’s Fund, GOAL, PLAN International, World Vision, Oxfam, Terre des Hommes, CARE International, Catholic Relief Services, etc.

  • Compared to National NGOs, may have stronger technical capacity and access to TA from its HQ.
  • Experience in other countries with OVC that can inform their work in target country.
  • Reasonably strong M&E capacity.
  • Can function as an intermediary for reaching a network of local NGOs and CBOs.
  • Ability to move quickly.
  • Sound accounting and financial management systems
  • Higher overhead rate.
  • May have less in-country experience and knowledge than national NGOs.
  • Limited experience with World Bank procurement and financial management guidelines.
  • Likely to pull out as soon as funds dry up.

National NGOs with child focus

  • Knowledge of the local culture and environment.
  • Much lower cost than international NGOs.
  • More sustainable, since they will be there once the international NGOs have left.
  • Can function as an intermediary for reaching a network of CBOs.
  • Ability to move quickly.
  • Generally, limited organizational capacity, particularly in administration.
  • Often financially very weak, so unless project provides some funds for indirect costs, may go out of business during project period.

Community Based Organizations and local Faith-Based Organizations

  • Good knowledge of local culture.
  • Strong incentive to maintain credibility in eyes of community.
  • Lowest cost given heavy reliance on volunteer staff.
  • Any investment in capacity will stay in the community.
  • Many faith-based organizations have experience caring for OVC and organizing foster care.
  • Accepted by the community.
  • Faith-based organizations are capable of a rapid scale-up, given their national networks of affiliated churches.
  • Very limited organizational capacity.
  • May not be entirely representative of the community (especially of women).
  • Experience of faith-based organizations may be mostly with institutional approaches to caring for OVC.

Local Government

  • Access to target communities.
  • Capable of coordinating among local representatives of various ministries.
  • Has potential of providing on-going support to and supervision of OVC initiatives.
  • Will be there after the project ends.
  • Generally, limited capacity.
  • May have difficulty gaining trust of communities.
  • May be slow and bureaucratic.


Select a topic from the menu to go directly to the page of your interest: