|
These materials are directed toward facilitators of
the World Links Organization's Planning for School-based
Telecenters workshop.
In preparing to facilitate this workshop, there are
a few preparatory actions that you'll need to set in
motion (in addition to reading these materials thoroughly).
Many of the procedures and suggestions offered emerge
from the field test of this workshop, 5 - 9 February,
2001, in Harare, Zimbabwe. Subsequent field testing,
in Jinja, Uganda, in September, 2001, resulted in additional
changes to the agenda and to the facilitation notes.
GOALS
AND OBJECTIVES
The
overall goals of the Planning for School-based Telecenters
workshop are to enable school leaders and WorLD teachers
to:
-
Explore the concept of school-based telecenters in
relation to their schools and communities
- Connect
the operation of a school-based telecenter with the
financial sustainability of their WorLD computer lab
and their school
- Begin
the concrete steps necessary to plan, initiate, and
operate a school-based telecenter successfully
In
general, the workshop should be as active and interactive
as possible. The more time that participants spend discussing,
asking questions (of each other or of you) and engaging
in the planning process, the more likely they
are
to continue these processes after the workshop.
OBJECTIVES
To
accomplish the workshop goals, specific objectives can
be targeted.
Upon completion of the workshop, participants should
be able to:
- Convincingly
explain the rationale for a telecenter to their colleagues
at school and to their community
- Identify
clients in their primary, secondary, and developmental
markets
- Identify
potential partners and sponsors in their communities
- Plan
market research based on interviews and focus groups
- Describe
a "service mix" that will address the needs of those
markets
- Propose
various means of staffing and scheduling telecenter
operations in their school
- Propose
steps in a marketing campaign targeting their identified
markets
- Complete
a financial plan that will enable budget forecasting,
as well as outreach to community groups and potential
sponsors or partners
All
of these objectives should be accomplished without losing
sight of the fact that the proposed telecenters are
to be operated in schools, and that the primary goal
of the WorLD program is to increase the quality of teaching
and learning in schools.
WorLD
schools and many others around the world may be the
recipients of computer facilities that have been donated,
purchased by ministries of education, or otherwise provided
for them. These facilities present challenges and opportunities,
both of which must be addressed if the initial investment
is going to be returned as enhanced learning and education
over the course of time.
In brief, there are two major areas of challenge / opportunity
that give the concept of the school-based telecenter
its importance. These areas span both economic development
and education reform.
The
computer facility, under all circumstances, requires
ongoing funding to maintain and operate.
Telephone and Internet costs, hardware and software
maintenance, upgrades, increased security, and many
other expenses may not be addressed in original budgeting
for a computer lab. In many instances, hardware may
already be out of date. In all instances, it will be
out of date soon enough, and will require maintenance
throughout the course of its life.
The concept of sustainability may need to be addressed
in concrete terms: In Februrary, 2001, the WorLD schools
in Zimbabwe reported that roughly eight of ten computers
were functioning at
the
time of the field test for this workshop. It's critical
to draw participants' attention to their needs, and
to the potential of the telecenter to fulfill these.
The
school-based telecenter is, chiefly, a means for schools
to ensure the sustainability of their computer facilities.
DIGITAL
AND EDUCATIONAL DIVIDES
In
many countries and regions, the gap between schools
and communities is wide. In developing countries, communities
themselves may also be cut off from information skills
and resources-in health care, nutrition, governance
and civil society, employment and the economy-that can
improve the lives of their members.
The school-based telecenter has the potential to bridge
both of these gaps: to enhance the connection between
schools and families, local government and NGOs, even
the private sector, and; to make critical information
skills and services available to under-served populations.
Ideally,
of course, the initial bridges established by the school-based
telecenter will lead to increased participation in knowledge-related
activities in all sectors of a community, from its children
to its teachers to its families and its leaders.
(In the short term, however, teachers and school heads
may see the greatest value in using the telecenter to
reach "school-leavers," university students, and other
populations that are close to their core constituencies.)
As
an experienced facilitator, you are probably aware that
the more you talk, the less they listen. Certainly,
when you are dealing with school heads and master teachers,
that will be the case (unless you are a spectacularly
compelling speaker).
Be
sure to maintain a high level of interactivity by making
use of the following workshop formats:
- Question-and-answer
sessions
- Brainstorming
(by whole groups and working groups)
- Simulations
(as in the key informant interviews and focus groups
of Module 4)
- Break-out
group activities
Bear
in mind, however, that working groups require time to
report on their progress and achievements-and that in
some instances their results are duplicated in group
after group. On occasion, it may be possible to ask
one or two groups to present their results, then invite
other groups to explain briefly how their results differ.
TIME
MANAGEMENT
There
is a huge amount of material to cover in this workshop.
Time management is, for this reason, especially critical.
However, different groups will have different needs
and interests-because the conditions that affect their
management of school computer labs and community
telecenters
will be different. For this reason:
- The
agenda should remain flexible
- Several
modules are identified as "optional"
- Every
effort should be made to move swiftly from topic introductions
to the activities
The
activities-far more than any information that you can
deliver-are key to the success of the workshop. When
they have been completed, the array of results from
the different working groups will be truly impressive.
Everyone will feel as though something is accomplished.
In addition, you have the chance, in responding to participants'
presentations, to share your knowledge and insight in
the most relevant possible ways. If you give away everything
that you know in advance (in a "blah blah blah" session),
you won't have anything left to say following the presentations.
"FIREHOSE"
SESSIONS
One
of the challenges in working with a large group arises
when it's time to report the results of break-out sessions.
It takes a lot of workshop time, and many times the
reports are repetitive. This problem is most acute,
of course, when participants work in pairs and groups.
Consider
introducing the "firehose" session. In this technique,
participants are limited to a specific (and brutally
short) period of time-say one minute or 30 seconds.
Ask a volunteer time-keeper to keep track, to announce
(or hold up a sign) at appropriate warning points, and
to cut off the speaker. Assist the timekeeper in keeping
order.
Properly done (and in the right circumstances), firehose
sessions can be lively and enjoyable. Generally, they
should be used when the results of the working group
are likely to be repetitive, and when the information
is not critical at that point in the planning process.
A
firehose session is specifically suggested for activity
5.4: Knowledge Resources, but you may find the opportunity
to introduce this process earlier in the workshop.
PRE-WORKSHOP
INFORMATION
Detailed
information from the country program that is hosting
the workshop is essential. Specific information about
participants, the school system, and the World Links
country program itself, should all be requested at the
earliest possible dates. Suggested information should
address:
- Participants'
level of experience in the WorLD program
- Level
of technical knowledge of participants
- Operations,
staffing, and organization of WorLD labs (e.g., Are
there full-time resource teachers?, etc.)
- Cachement
areas for WorLD labs (e.g., Does the lab serve one
school or several schools?)
- Other
special features of the WorLD program in the host
country
|